Abstract
Background: simulated practice is a pedagogical strategy that encourages decision-making in clinical cases. Its implementation takes place in stages, the briefing being the first. Objective: to understand the representation of the briefing for students and teachers involved in the simulated practice classes of the Nursing undergraduate course. Methodology: qualitative and descriptive study guided by the theory of social representations. 37 students of the Nursing Degree course participated, who were enrolled in curricular units that used the simulated practice methodology and the 7 teachers of the same curricular units. Data collection was performed using a questionnaire that contained a Free Word Association Test. Data analysis was performed using the IRAMUTEQ software. Results: students represent the briefing valuing the cognitive domain, but also emphasizing the affective domain. Teachers value the preparation of scenarios to broaden the horizon of students, seeking to increase knowledge and experience through the establishment of learning objectives. Conclusion: considering the objectives of the simulated practice, the briefing is represented as a step that promotes knowledge, learning and skills, but also generates emotions.
References
Abric, J.C. (2011). Méthodologie de recueil des représentations sociales. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Pratiques Sociales et Représentations (pp. 73–102). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Beischel, K.P. (2013). Variables Affecting Learning in a Simulation Experience. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945911408444
Brackney, D.E., & Priode, K.S. (2014). Creating context with prebriefing: A case example using simulation. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v5n1p129
Camargo, B.V., Bousfield, A.B.S., Giacomozzi, A.I., & Koelzer, L.P. (2014). Representações sociais e adesão ao tratamento antirretroviral. Liberabit, 20(2), 1729–4827. Retrieved from http://revistaliberabit.com/es/revistas/RLE_20_2_representacoes-sociais-e-adesao-ao-tratamento-antirretroviral.pdf
Camargo, B.V., & Justo, A.M. (2016). Tutorial para uso do software IRAMUTEQ (Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires). Retrieved from http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/Tutorial IRaMuTeQ em portugues_17.03.2016.pdf
Chamberlain, J. (2015). Prebriefing in Nursing Simulation: A Concept Analysis Using Rodger’s Methodology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(7), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.05.003
Elfrink, V.L., Nininger, J., Rohig, L., & Lee, J. (2009). The case for group planning in human patient simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 83–86.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area ESG. Brussels. Retrieved from https://enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf
Foronda, C.L., Swoboda, S., Hudson, K., Jones, E., Sullivan, N., Ockimeyf, J., & Jeffries, P. (2016). Evaluation of vSIM for NursingTM: A Trial of Innovation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(4), 128–131. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.12.006
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A Longitudinal, Randomized, Controlled Study Replacing Clinical Hours with Simulation in Prelicensure Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S3–S40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30062-4
Husebø, S.E., Friberg, F., Søreide, E., & Rystedt, H. (2012). Instructional Problems in Briefings: How to Prepare Nursing Students for Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(7), e307–e318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.12.002
International Nursing Association for, & Clinical Simulation and Learning [INACSL]. (2016). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM Simulation Glossary. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S39–S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012
Lioce, L., Meakim, C.H., Fey, M.K., Chmil, J.V., Mariani, B., & Alinier, G. (2015). Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard IX: Simulation Design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(6), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.03.005
Loubère, L. (2016). L’analyse de similitude pour modéliser les CHD. In Actes Des 13eme Journées Internationales d’Analyse Statistique Des Données Textuelles. JADT 2016.
Meakim, C., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A.E., Gloe, D., Lioce, L., … Borum, J. C. (2013). Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard I: Terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001
Mota, L., Maia, C., Soares, F., Marreiros, T., Silva, A.R., & Freitas, R. (2019). Perspetiva dos estudantes e docentes acerca do debriefing na prática simulada. Revista de Investigação & Inovação Em Saúde, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37914/riis.v2i1.46
Page-Cutrara, K., & Turk, M. (2017). Impact of prebriefing on competency performance, clinical judgment and experience in simulation: An experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 48, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.012
Rudolph, J.W., Raemer, D.B., & Simon, R. (2014). Establishing a Safe Container for Learning in Simulation. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 9(6), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047
Sharoff, L. (2015). Simulation: Pre-briefing Preparation, Clinical Judgment and Reflection. What is the Connection? Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.16899/ctd.49922
Tyerman, J., Luctkar-Flude, M., Graham, L., Coffey, S., & Olsen-Lynch, E. (2016). Pre-simulation preparation and briefing practices for healthcare professionals and students. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 14(8), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003055